Saturday, February 4, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Why the Ecofiscal Commission is a failure: Philip Cross in the Financial Post

March 1, 2016
in Columns, In the Media, Latest News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

Philip CrossAn inability to convince governments to pair a carbon tax with a corresponding income tax cut is just one of the reasons why Philip Cross is declaring the Ecofiscal Commission a failure.

By Philip Cross, March 1, 2016

Fifteen months ago, the Ecofiscal Commission was launched, with some of Canada’s most renowned self-appointed commissioners making it their goal to reduce carbon emissions by creating a more efficient tax system. Judging by either of those two criteria, the project could be rechristened the EcoFailure Commission, since it has not made any progress on either.

How can I call it a failure, when governments across the country are poised to impose taxes on carbon, the favourite tool of commission chair Christopher Ragan and his merry band of Ecofiscalists? First, the commission has abysmally failed to convince governments to offset higher carbon taxes with lower income taxes, which has left us with tax grabs instead of a more efficient tax system. Second, it has failed to convince ordinary Canadians of the need to change their behaviour, without which carbon taxes will not be high enough to change anything, especially when oil prices are collapsing and auto and gasoline sales are soaring. Third, the commission has ignored technological innovation, the real long-term way to increase energy efficiency, because of its single-minded devotion to controlling carbon emissions by tinkering with the price system.

To reduce petroleum demand in this country would require either taxes that raise prices well above their 2014 highs or a recession in incomes such that Canadians could not afford to consume at current rates. Gasoline prices today in most parts of the country are 30 to 40 cents a litre below their 2014 highs so, by itself, a carbon tax would have to boost prices by well more than that to lower consumption (barring a recession). There is no government in Canada publicly considering a gasoline tax of 50 to 60 cents a litre. That would be political suicide.

The Ecofiscal Commission doesn’t even hint at the tax increase that eventually will be required to meet its carbon ambitions.

The current carbon tax of a few cents a litre being proposed in Alberta, Ontario and Quebec, and already in effect in B.C., are the modern equivalents of the papal indulgences issued in medieval times: a token paid to assuage the conscience for having committed a sinful activity. To the degree that carbon taxes mislead people into thinking they are alleviating a problem while still burning fossil fuels, they may worsen their desired outcome.

The Ecofiscal Commission doesn’t even hint at the tax increase that eventually will be required to meet its carbon ambitions. It trumpets studies that pretend to measure the responsiveness of emissions to carbon taxes, and we know the future emissions targets Canada is committed to achieving. But the commission refuses to meld the two to come up with even a rough estimate of what it will cost Canadian consumers to hit the carbon target. This silence probably reflects that the needed tax increase would be enormous, taking the whole idea of a carbon tax off the table immediately. There is much that is disingenuous about a Trojan Horse plan that aims to first get everyone onside with the idea of a carbon tax, only to then slowly reveal the magnitude that will be required.

The real work the commission should be undertaking is the heroic task of convincing Canadians they need to accept sharply higher energy taxes to fundamentally alter their behaviour. Instead, the EcoFailure brain trust simply provides a convenient intellectual cover for governments to engage in a tax grab that does nothing to address the long-run trend of rising fuel consumption. Convincing Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne to raise taxes is child’s play, not a signature achievement.

Governments no longer even pretend to be designing a more efficient tax system, unlike the way B.C. did when it offset higher carbon taxes with lower income taxes. Instead, cash-strapped governments in Alberta, Ontario and Quebec are simply raising carbon taxes with no offsetting cuts. And let’s be clear: Revenue neutrality means an equal reduction in other taxes, not an equal hike in spending on the environment, as Rachel Notley’s government claimed in Alberta’s budget. Only in the warped world of NDP accounting is a tax hike combined with more spending “revenue neutral.” Instead of being outraged that governments are so brazenly distorting its ideas, the EcoFailure Commission meekly watches in silence, lacking the courage of its own convictions that the tax system should be designed more efficiently.

The real work the commission should be undertaking is the heroic task of convincing Canadians they need to accept sharply higher energy taxes to fundamentally alter their behaviour.

The timidity of governments in raising carbon taxes may also reflect the fact that they know the only real solution will come from technological innovation (just as the solution to traffic congestion is driverless vehicles, not the road tolls Ragan advocates). However, as Steve Johnson noted in his book Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation, we lack a solid theory of how innovation occurs.

Johnson argues that, contrary to assumptions, innovation may not be primarily driven by profit or high prices. Instead, innovations are most likely to come in clusters and in areas researchers are already working on (“the adjacent possible” — extensions of what innovators are already working on — not “lightning bolt” ideas out of the blue). This is encouraging since there is plenty of work actively going on in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including within the oil industry. Until such innovations occur, governments should drop the pretense that carbon taxes are about anything except raising their own revenues.

Philip Cross is the former chief economic analyst at Statistics Canada.

Tags: Financial PostPhilip Cross
Previous Post

Sean Speer and Ken Coates available to comment on Aboriginal affairs ahead of premiers’ meetings

Next Post

Our unsustainable debt addiction: Philip Cross in the Financial Post

Related Posts

Stronger enforcement of the Competition Act is better than a dramatic overhaul
Commentary

Stronger enforcement of the Competition Act is better than a dramatic overhaul

February 2, 2023
Most Canadians think prisons should continue to house male and female prisoners separately
Releases

Most Canadians think prisons should continue to house male and female prisoners separately

February 2, 2023
Defending democracies from disinformation: A new imperative for Canada-Japan strategic cooperation
Past Events

Webinar panel video: Defending democracies from disinformation – A new imperative for Canada-Japan strategic cooperation

February 2, 2023
Next Post
Philip Cross

Our unsustainable debt addiction: Philip Cross in the Financial Post

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Follow us on

Newsletter Signup

First Name
Last Name
Email Address

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

Inside Policy Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Back Issues
  • Advertising
  • Inside Policy Blog
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

IDEAS CHANGE THE WORLD!Have the latest Canadian thought leadership delivered straight to your inbox.
First Name
Last Name
Email address

No thanks, I’m not interested.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Privacy Preference Center

Consent Management

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other