Wednesday, May 31, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Online
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Online
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
    • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Stop the TPP-IP media pile-on: Richard Owens for the MLI IP newsletter

May 12, 2016
in Columns, Inside Policy, Latest News, Richard Owens
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A

Macdonald-Laurier InstituteIt has become fashionable to declare the Trans-Pacific Partnership intellectual property provisions a disaster for innovation in Canada, writes Richard C. Owens. But that doesn’t make it right.

By Richard C. Owens, May 13, 2016

Even in the law and innovation communities it has become fashionable in Canada to be critical of intellectual property. The intellectual property provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which when implemented will strengthen IP rules generally among signatories, are prey to this fashion.

While the right sometimes will criticize IP as monopolistic, the left, perhaps because it tends to be critical of property in general, is the more common breeding ground of critics. The Broadbent Institute, Professor Michael Geist of the University of Ottawa, Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University, Munk Centre denizens Dan Breznitz and David Wolfe, Brock University Professor Blayne Haggart and of course, Jim Balsillie, all have recently published or had reported criticisms of the TPP IP chapter. I extensively critiqued such criticism in a paper published by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Debunking Alarmism Over the TPP and IP. Alas, that paper did not stem the critical flow. TPP negativism has been abetted by the media who uncritically report it, often without balancing perspectives. As we can see from the US election debate, the neo-liberal orthodoxy of the benefits of free trade is not so securely ensconced in public opinion that it, and the reason and research behind it, do not need restatement and reinforcement.

Various arguments are raised against the TPP. One broad class of argument is that Canada lacks innovation capability and will therefore be disadvantaged in the world in which the TPP is implemented. This is premised on the notions that additional IP protection will stymie innovation (not so), and that Canada is in a negative balance of trade position in IP-protected goods and therefore will suffer economically if IP rights are extended. Most simply, and like so many arguments against the IP provisions of the TPP, this one falls down on the fact that the TPP makes virtually no significant changes to Canada’s IP regime. Moreover, by strengthening the IP regimes of our trading partners it can only help Canadians and improve the balance of trade. And, studies show the implementation of the TPP to have a minimal negative or a positive effect on Canada economically.

It is also suggested that the way to address the problem of insufficient innovation in Canada is to weaken its IP legal regime. From this perspective, the TPP is seen to be problematic for locking us into excessive IP rights, preventing future loosening to spur innovation. But in fact Canada, while admittedly having a great deal to improve upon, has an innovative economy ranking surprisingly high in some criteria — for instance, R&D investment and attractiveness to venture capital — in the recent (4th) edition of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s annual International IP Index. To suggest that Canada’s innovation would be spurred by cutting back on IP protection is counterintuitive and not borne out by the literature. Moreover, to cut back our IP regime is unrealistic and would conflict with existing treaties.

Critics often seem not to fully grasp the admittedly complex provisions of the TPP and of Canada’s background IP regime. Sometimes their criticisms are deliberately evasive, other times they seem to stem from insufficient attention to the TPP text. Critics seem to feel free to speak fairly broadly against the TPP. One critic for instance states simply in the Globe that “the sections on intellectual property rights, foreign investment rules and trade secrets are particularly troubling.” without elaboration. It seems to be simply taken as read.

Whatever makes it fashionable to oppose property rights and free trade, it has become especially important for IP and trade scholars to continue to articulate disciplined insights and empirical study over ideological and political rhetoric. The great importance of IP rules to the innovation economy will be extensively analyzed in an upcoming report on Canada’s IP regime to be published by the MLI. There is not space here for a comprehensive rebuttal of TPP iconoclasm. But it is fair to ask why critics should make easy, populist slanders of the TPP, while it falls to those of us who actually have read it carefully to muster a point by point defence. It is time for more balance in the debate of trade and IP.

Richard C. Owens is an adjunct professor at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law.

Tags: intellectual propertyIP newsletterRichard OwensTrans-Pacific Partnership
Previous Post

Tanker ban will cost good jobs with little environmental benefit: Sean Speer and Brian Lee Crowley in the Vancouver Sun

Next Post

Dodged bullet or missed opportunity with CHEO settlement?: Richard Owens for the MLI IP newsletter

Related Posts

Taiwan is at the ‘top of the agenda’ for Biden administration: Stephen Nagy on CNBC
Video

Taiwan is at the ‘top of the agenda’ for Biden administration: Stephen Nagy on CNBC

May 30, 2023
Tokyo and Seoul’s on alert as North Korea prepares to launch satellite: Stephen Nagy on ABC News
Video

Tokyo and Seoul’s on alert as North Korea prepares to launch satellite: Stephen Nagy on ABC News

May 30, 2023
To maintain western support, Ukraine must carefully manage its anti-Kremlin Russian allies: Matthew Bondy for Inside Policy
Inside Policy

To maintain western support, Ukraine must carefully manage its anti-Kremlin Russian allies: Matthew Bondy for Inside Policy

May 29, 2023
Next Post
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Dodged bullet or missed opportunity with CHEO settlement?: Richard Owens for the MLI IP newsletter

Newsletter Signup

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Online
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
    • Podcasts

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.