Thursday, February 2, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

National drug plan process doesn’t add up: Nigel Rawson in the Hamilton Spectator

Canadians want a list of medicines and a program that ensure the right patient receives the right medicine at the right time at an affordable cost.

February 23, 2022
in Columns, Domestic Policy Program, Health, In the Media, Latest News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A


This article originally appeared in the Hamilton Spectator. 

By Nigel Rawson, February 23, 2022

Theatre of the Absurd features plays about people caught in an incomprehensible world subject to any event, no matter how illogical or unrealistic. The federal government’s pan-Canadian Advisory Panel on a Framework for a Prescription Drug List is one such event.

The panel’s mandate is to recommend principles and a framework for developing a national list or formulary of prescription medicines that government drug plans would be willing to insure — one that could eventually replace the list each government plan already has. A national formulary is a cornerstone in the federal government’s plans for a Canadian Drug Agency and a national pharmacare program.

The reason for developing a national list is to try to introduce consistency and conformity in access across Canada. That sounds reasonable. However, we don’t know whether the intention is to develop a bare-bones list of so-called essential medicines for a small number of common diseases, or a comprehensive list of medicines in line with the best provincial formularies or, even better, like the benefit lists of private insurance companies.

What’s the absurdity? Well, the fundamental elements of how the cost of implementing a national formulary would be paid for and what patients’ out-of-pocket costs would be are deemed out of scope for the advisory panel. This makes no sense, because being able to access a covered medicine is not simply a matter of whether it’s on the list. Access also depends on whether patients can afford any required copayments.

Current out-of-pocket costs vary widely between provinces. For example, the average Ontario senior using the province’s drug plan pays an annual deductible of $100 after which only a dispensing fee of up to $6.11 is required for any medicine on Ontario’s formulary. In contrast, unless seniors in Saskatchewan have an annual income under $69,057 or catastrophic prescription drug costs, the government provides no coverage, resulting in seniors having to pay all costs of their prescription medicines including a dispensing fee of nearly twice Ontario’s.

If Ottawa believes Canadians need a national formulary, the government must also plan how the cost of sustaining it would be paid and be transparent about what patients would be expected to pay. This requires resolving not just inter-provincial formulary differences but also addressing the multiple types of existing drug insurance. These include private plans that cover two-thirds of Canadians, public programs which mostly cover seniors and social assistance recipients and provide so-called “first dollar” funding for drugs on their formularies, and exceptional access and catastrophic coverage programs.

The advisory panel has been tasked with creating an initial list of medicines and intends to begin with cardiovascular, diabetes and psychiatric drugs. The consistency of coverage of these drugs by existing government formularies is already good. Instead of the more difficult task of addressing drug classes where inconsistency exists between government plans, the panel is starting with those that need little attention.

The panel has so far recommended six guiding principles for the formulary: universal and integrated; equitable; effective and high quality; sustainable; efficient and timely; inclusive, transparent and fair process. These are values with which most Canadians would agree.

However, what Canadians really want is a list of medicines and a program that ensure the right patient receives the right medicine at the right time at an affordable cost. Devising a formulary in a vacuum divorced from how a national program would be funded, what patients’ out-of-pocket costs would be, and how it would work with the current multiple coverage options is absurd.

Nigel Rawson is an independent researcher and an affiliate scholar with the Canadian Health Policy Institute. He is a frequent author at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
Tags: Domestic Affairsdomestic policyDrugdrug pricingHealth PolicyNigel Rawson
Previous Post

Canadians should speak out against the government’s illiberal turn: Aaron Wudrick in the National Review

Next Post

Russian propagandists are exploiting protests to destabilize our democracy: Marcus Kolga in the Toronto Star

Related Posts

Building the Free and Open Indo-Pacific with like-minded partners: A view from Japan – Akiko Fukushima for Inside Policy
Inside Policy

Building the Free and Open Indo-Pacific with like-minded partners: A view from Japan – Akiko Fukushima for Inside Policy

January 31, 2023
How pipelines went from villain to hero in Indigenous reconciliation: Heather Exner-Pirot in the Calgary Herald
Columns

Alberta must assert itself over oil and gas against unilateral emissions cuts: Jack Mintz and Janice MacKinnon in the National Post

January 30, 2023
Henry Dundas was an abolitionist. He deserves a street named after him: Patrice Dutil in the National Post
Columns

Henry Dundas was an abolitionist. He deserves a street named after him: Patrice Dutil in the National Post

January 30, 2023
Next Post
Putin’s contentious victory could mean dark days ahead for Russia: Aurel Braun in the Conversation

Russian propagandists are exploiting protests to destabilize our democracy: Marcus Kolga in the Toronto Star

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Follow us on

Newsletter Signup

First Name
Last Name
Email Address

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

Inside Policy Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Back Issues
  • Advertising
  • Inside Policy Blog
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

IDEAS CHANGE THE WORLD!Have the latest Canadian thought leadership delivered straight to your inbox.
First Name
Last Name
Email address

No thanks, I’m not interested.