Friday, January 27, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Justin Trudeau’s ‘just trust me’ moment: Aaron Wudrick in the National Post

Even accepting that cabinet has the latitude to take a wider view than CSIS, surely it cannot have a completely free hand.

November 28, 2022
in Aaron Wudrick, Domestic Policy Program, In the Media, Latest News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
Justin Trudeau’s ‘just trust me’ moment: Aaron Wudrick in the National Post

Photo by POEC, via Twitter.

This article originally appeared in the National Post.

By Aaron Wudrick, November 28 2022

Now that Canadians have been subjected to six straight weeks of witness testimony at the Public Emergency Order Commission – the statutorily required inquiry called following the Trudeau government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act this past February – they might be forgiven for asking why we even bothered.

That’s because we’re not much closer to being able to understand the legal basis for the government’s use of the Act than we were before it started, other than to learn that there is apparently a legal opinion, somewhere, that says they were justified in doing so.

Who wrote that opinion? What does it say? Sorry, that’s covered by solicitor-client privilege. The absurdity of the situation was such that when Justice Minister David Lametti testified earlier this week, Commissioner Paul Rouleau was left to observe the difficulty of trying to do his job of determining whether the government acted within the law if he is left in the dark as to the government’s understanding of what the law actually required.

To be clear: the federal government is not obligated to waive solicitor-client privilege. We’ve already seen Ontario Premier Doug Ford refuse to waive any privilege at all, opting instead to hide behind parliamentary privilege to avoid appearing at the inquiry entirely. But it’s a bit rich for the federal government to brag about its commitment to transparency and point to its willingness to waive privilege when it refuses to do so in the specific area necessary to allow the inquiry to answer the central question it was established to address.

Instead, Canadians are left to piece together an interpretation of the criteria that must be met for the government to invoke the Emergencies Act that departs drastically from the plain meaning of the words.

The main point of contention surrounds the definition of “threats to the security of Canada,” the threshold for which must be met (along with other criteria) for the government to legitimately use the Act.  For the purposes of a “public order emergency” –the category of emergency ultimately used by the government to invoke the Act – this is defined in section 16 as having “the meaning assigned by section 2 of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act.”

How does section 2 of the CSIS Act define threats to the security of Canada? In sum: serious espionage and sabotage; pernicious foreign influence; the threat of serious violence; or the threat of a coup d’etat.

Did the convoy protest meet this definition? CSIS Director David Vigneault testified that in the opinion of CSIS, it did not. But there was a catch: Vigneault – and other witnesses besides – said that according to legal advice, this did not prevent from cabinet reaching a different conclusion.

Strictly speaking, this is correct, because the Act only requires that the section 2 criteria be used to determine whether there’s a threat to the security of Canada; it doesn’t say that CSIS has to be the one to make that determination. Cabinet, as the ultimate political decision-maker, has the authority to disagree with CSIS and reach a different conclusion.

That latitude isn’t unlimited, however: section 17 of the Emergencies Act also makes clear that while cabinet makes the final call, they don’t have carte blanche. They still have to have “reasonable grounds” and also apply the same section 2 criteria.

This is what makes revealing the alluded-to legal advice so crucial: without knowing what precisely is different about cabinet’s analysis – variously described by witnesses as “broader” or constituting “different inputs” – it’s impossible to evaluate either the legal soundness of this opinion, or measure the government’s conclusion against this new, unknown threshold.

So we are instead left to guess. In his own testimony, Prime Minister Trudeau gave examples of several factors, such as the weaponization of vehicles and the potential use of children as human shields, that he felt needed to be considered. And while these are very serious concerns indeed, it’s not clear that they wouldn’t already be covered by the official CSIS analysis. And if CSIS did not conclude such factors met the section 2 test, what, if any, separate criteria did the government rely on to reach a different conclusion?

This is not a small question. Even accepting that cabinet has the latitude to take a wider view than CSIS, surely it cannot have a completely free hand. The Emergencies Act is an extreme law that confers immense powers to government, and was explicitly designed to be very difficult to use. If cabinet can simply wave away all the built-in safeguards at its pleasure, it would defeat the entire purpose of having any in the first place.

In retrospect, so long as the government refused to waive the requisite privilege, the entire inquiry process was doomed to reach this dead end. Canadians will apparently just have to trust the government that a legal opinion they’ve never seen gave the government license to apply criteria they won’t discuss, in order to invoke the most draconian law on the books.

Aaron Wudrick is a lawyer and the director of the domestic policy program at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.

Source: National Post
Tags: Freedom ConvoyOttawaPOECTrudeau
Previous Post

COVID vaccine mandates in Canada were a mistake: Are we ready to learn the right lessons?

Next Post

Tangled nets – unravelling the fisheries impasse in the Maritimes: Ken Coates in Saltwire

Related Posts

Alberta 2023 and beyond: Fiscal policy, health care and federal-provincial relations
Releases

How Alberta can ensure greater prosperity in 2023 and beyond

January 26, 2023
Alberta 2023 and beyond: Fiscal policy, health care and federal-provincial relations
Papers

Alberta 2023 and beyond: Fiscal policy, health care and federal-provincial relations

January 26, 2023
Ford’s health-care plan – disruptive innovation, not privatization: Shawn Whatley in the Financial Post
Columns

Ford’s health-care plan – disruptive innovation, not privatization: Shawn Whatley in the Financial Post

January 25, 2023
Next Post
Tangled nets – unravelling the fisheries impasse in the Maritimes: Ken Coates in Saltwire

Tangled nets - unravelling the fisheries impasse in the Maritimes: Ken Coates in Saltwire

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Follow us on

Newsletter Signup

First Name
Last Name
Email Address

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

Inside Policy Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Back Issues
  • Advertising
  • Inside Policy Blog
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

IDEAS CHANGE THE WORLD!Have the latest Canadian thought leadership delivered straight to your inbox.
First Name
Last Name
Email address

No thanks, I’m not interested.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Privacy Preference Center

Consent Management

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other