Saturday, June 3, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Online
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
    • Podcasts
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Online
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
    • Podcasts
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Canadians only stand to benefit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s e-commerce changes: Owens in the Post

January 8, 2016
in Columns, In the Media, Latest News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

Logo_Placeholder_RedMuch has been made of the e-commerce provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal. Richard C. Owens, writing in the National Post, says the agreement will only help Canadian business, innovation and consumers.

By Richard C. Owens, Jan. 8, 2015

Like the intellectual property chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the electronic commerce chapter has taken some knocks. Professor Michael Geist of the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law has been particularly critical, calling both chapters a “major failure” of negotiation. A comprehensive assessment shows them to be anything but.

The IP chapter is long. The electronic commerce chapter (chapter 14) is not. This reflects the far wider international agreement on IP rules and principles, as reflected in many treaties. Electronic commerce is newer; governments are still determining how best to legislate over it effectively, and have adopted different approaches. Out of the diversity and paucity of electronic commerce regulation emerges a narrow common ground. Thus one of chapter 14’s articles provides for extensive international cooperation on the development of policies and laws. Perhaps the relative brevity of the chapter is the reason that criticism has focused on what it doesn’t say, rather than what it does. As Professor Geist said, “Canadian negotiators adopted a defensive strategy… doing little to extend Canadian policies to other countries.”

Extend Canadian policies to other countries? Could that seriously be an objective of a Canadian trade negotiation team? Isn’t trade negotiation tough enough without aspirations to legislative imperialism?

Professor Geist laments that the Chapter 14 provisions dealing with unsolicited commercial electronic messages are insufficiently like Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL). But why would Pacific Rim nations want CASL, which is so harshly judged in Canada? Look at what, in the absence of copying CASL, was accomplished in the TPP. It requires minimization of unsolicited messages, or the ability to opt-out of, or consent to, commercial messaging; recourse against suppliers for unwanted messages; and international cooperation in cases of concern. This is good work for a treaty whose object is trade generally, not solely electronic commerce.

Professor Geist raises similar complaints about the personal information protection provisions of the TPP. In this area, Canada has a patchwork of laws across the country; why would the nations of the Pacific Rim be persuaded to adopt Canada’s example (assuming that they could make sense of it)? And again, the TPP duly emphasizes the importance of the protection of personal information, requires enforceable privacy protection and requires each party to encourage the development of mechanisms to promote compatibility between their differing privacy regimes. This is an improvement over the existing state of affairs in that it creates the expectation of a developing reciprocal protection of privacy. Chapter 14 also requires the parties to promote international compatibility of their regimes.

Notch another one for the consumer.

Professor Geist worries also because the TPP requires that parties allow the cross-border transfer of business data, including personal data. This, of course, is now the norm and international business would be severely hampered without the power to make such transfers. But lest anyone fear that this will cramp Canada’s ability to protect sensitive data, the rule does not apply to data held by or contracted for by governments, thus saving British Columbia’s and Nova Scotia’s existing initiatives regarding the processing of health information, and allowing others to be formed. It is also subject to any policy a party may establish for any “legitimate policy purpose,” provided it doesn’t constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or disguised restriction on trade, and does not impose restrictions greater than are required to achieve the objective.

By setting out principles rather than dictating legislative text, the TPP preserves a wide scope to governments to mould law and policy to their own circumstances. Preserved too is the ability of any government or person to try to persuade a party to take one legislative approach or another. The field remains open to convince, for instance, Vietnam or Brunei to adopt CASL; but to expect the TPP to set out detailed legislative policies where no international consensus is yet formed is to forget that it is a trade treaty, not a novel IP/electronic commerce initiative. Indeed it is remarkable what a forward-looking treaty it is, given the tight constraints of trade negotiation. Chapter 14 right off establishes non-discriminatory treatment of digital products, and a prohibition on customs duties on them, but also does so much more to create a shared and safe electronic commerce environment.

Missing in TPP commentary to date is the extent to which it enshrines consumer-oriented principles. In the IP chapter we see principles like the importance of the fair dealing exception to copyright, of the public domain, access to medicines, protection of public health, and assistance to less-developed economies. The electronic commerce chapter underscores the importance of online consumer protection, personal data protection, free access to the Internet and protection from spam emails, as well as international cooperation on these and other matters, including cybersecurity.

The TPP is good for Canadian innovators, business and consumers. Our new Liberal government should be encouraged to adopt it without delay.

Richard C. Owens is a Toronto lawyer and adjunct professor of law, and author of the recent “Debunking Alarmism over the TPP and IP: Why the Trans-Pacific Partnership is a Good Deal for Canadian Innovators” for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.

Tags: National PostRichard C. OwensTrans-Pacific Partnership
Previous Post

“It’s hard to imagine how it could get worse”, Cross tells BNN about oil prices

Next Post

Ottawa can help Canadians achieve a secure retirement without CPP expansion: MLI report by Philip Cross and Sean Speer

Related Posts

Ukraine must be victorious, for all of our sakes: Balkan Devlen for Inside Policy
Columns

Ukraine’s right to self-defence is self-evident: Chris Alexander in the Globe and Mail

June 2, 2023
Trudeau, Ford to blame for Stellantis shakedown: Aaron Wudrick in the National Post
Columns

Trudeau, Ford to blame for Stellantis shakedown: Aaron Wudrick in the National Post

June 2, 2023
Canada’s inadequate defence research funding is more than just a security risk: Richard Shimooka in the Hub
Columns

Canada’s inadequate defence research funding is more than just a security risk: Richard Shimooka in the Hub

June 1, 2023
Next Post
Ottawa can help Canadians achieve a secure retirement without CPP expansion: MLI report by Philip Cross and Sean Speer

Ottawa can help Canadians achieve a secure retirement without CPP expansion: MLI report by Philip Cross and Sean Speer

Newsletter Signup

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Online
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
    • Podcasts

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.