Friday, January 27, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Russian Shelling of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant Explained Using a Strategic Deterrence Framework: Gessaroli in Real Clear Defense

Russia will consider using nuclear weapons in the event of hostilities against Russia that directly threatens its security.

March 15, 2022
in Columns, Europe and Russia, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy Program, In the Media, Jerome Gessaroli, Latest News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A

This article originally appeared in Real Clear Defense. 

By Jerome Gessaroli, March 15, 2022

Why did Russia use artillery to shell the Ukrainian Zaporizhzhia nuclear power facility? Analysts described the action as extremely dangerous. If the artillery had hit more sensitive parts of the plant, the environmental and human costs from radiation leakage could have been immense. Perhaps a local commander made the decision, or Russian artillery targeting is very poor. However, it is also possible that Vladimir Putin, himself, ok’d the action. Targeting the reactor is difficult to explain in isolation. But if we include it in a broader framework looking at Russia’s deterrence strategy and apply a game theory lens, the decision looks more calculated.

Game theory is used in economics, political science, operations research, and other disciplines to model strategic decision-making. University of Chicago economist Roger Myerson describes game theory “… models as simplified versions of life that are meant to clarify some of the logic of life’s dilemmas…”. The game models typically are between two adversarial parties, based on a set of rules, where decisions have positive or negative outcomes for each party. When Russia states its position, goals, red lines, and importance on direct national security threats, it tries to influence NATO’s future actions—impressing upon NATO that any strong action it undertakes might come with very high costs (the possibility of nuclear war) from a Russian response.

Since the Soviet Union’s breakup, Russia’s conventional armed forces have been neither large enough nor technologically equivalent to challenge NATO. As a result, Russia has changed its policy regarding nuclear weapon use. Russia’s threshold for using nuclear weapons is now lower, as communicated in its formal military doctrine and its more general messaging.

But for Russia’s (or anyone’s) deterrence strategy to be effective, the threat of imposing extraordinarily high costs by using nuclear weapons must be credible. Not only must Russia have nuclear weapons, but it must also impress upon NATO their willingness to use such weapons in the face of significant NATO moves against Russia. Looking back, we can see a pattern of statements Vladimir Putin made on his willingness to consider using nuclear force.

  • In a 2014 talk at the Russian youth conference, Putin remarked that “…it is better not to enter into any potential armed conflict against us. … Let me remind you that Russia is one of the world’s biggest nuclear powers. These are not just words – this is the reality.”
  • In a 2018 interview, Putin stated, “…if someone decides to annihilate Russia, we have the legal right to respond. Yes, it will be a catastrophe for humanity and for the world. But I’m a citizen of Russia and its head of state. Why do we need a world without Russia in it?”
  • In 2020, a Russian nuclear doctrine document stated that nuclear weapons could be used when there is an attack upon the country “…with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is in jeopardy.”
  • During the launch of the Ukrainian invasion, Putin warned that “…whoever tries to impede us…[will face]…consequences you have never seen in history.” This is a thinly veiled threat of nuclear retaliation.
  • Four days into the Ukrainian war, President Putin ordered his nuclear forces to a heightened alert.

Each of the above statements signals to western leaders that Russia will consider using nuclear weapons in the event of hostilities against Russia that directly threatens its security. And very importantly, it does not matter whether the hostility against Russia involves nuclear weapons or only conventional forces.

Now consider Russia’s shelling of the nuclear reactor in along with their past statements. While the chance of a catastrophic or major radiation leak from the shelling was small, it was still possible. In a recent commentary, Tyler Cowen suggests the Russian action may well have been deliberate to impress upon the west that Russia is not afraid to introduce a nuclear option to the battlefield. This is consistent with Putin’s announcement days earlier to heighten the readiness of its nuclear forces. Not just statements, these actions again signal to NATO the potentially high costs of directly intervening.

Little has gone well for the Russians to date, except for their deterrence strategy. They have mounted the largest military invasion of a westward-leaning European country since World War 2. To date, there have been over 2 million refugees. Yet NATO has decided to directly stay out of the current war. NATO has multiple times declined Ukraine’s request to establish a no-fly zone over a part of Ukraine. And most recently, the United States has vetoed Ukrainian pilots from even flying the MiG 29 fighter jets offered by Poland from a NATO airfield. While deterrence strategy does not give a country the ability to win a war, it has restrained NATO involvement enough to allow Russia to keep its overwhelming battlefield advantage that may ultimately prove to be successful.

Jerome Gessaroli teaches at the British Columbia Institute of Technology and is a visiting fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Tags: Foreign Affairsforeign policyJerome GessaroliRussiaUkraine
Previous Post

Pod Bless Canada EP. 77 – “In Defence of Wealth” with Aaron Wudrick and Derek Bullen

Next Post

China’s potential long game – First dominate Russia, then on to the Arctic: Charles Burton in the Globe and Mail

Related Posts

Alberta 2023 and beyond: Fiscal policy, health care and federal-provincial relations
Releases

How Alberta can ensure greater prosperity in 2023 and beyond

January 26, 2023
Ford’s health-care plan – disruptive innovation, not privatization: Shawn Whatley in the Financial Post
Columns

Ford’s health-care plan – disruptive innovation, not privatization: Shawn Whatley in the Financial Post

January 25, 2023
Rethinking Bangladesh: A story of national resilience in the face of adversity – Ken Coates for Inside Policy
Inside Policy

Rethinking Bangladesh: A story of national resilience in the face of adversity – Ken Coates for Inside Policy

January 24, 2023
Next Post
China’s potential long game – First dominate Russia, then on to the Arctic: Charles Burton in the Globe and Mail

China’s potential long game - First dominate Russia, then on to the Arctic: Charles Burton in the Globe and Mail

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Follow us on

Newsletter Signup

First Name
Last Name
Email Address

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

Inside Policy Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Back Issues
  • Advertising
  • Inside Policy Blog
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

IDEAS CHANGE THE WORLD!Have the latest Canadian thought leadership delivered straight to your inbox.
First Name
Last Name
Email address

No thanks, I’m not interested.