Tuesday, March 21, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
    • Women’s History Month Fundraiser
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Annual Reports
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
    • Women’s History Month Fundraiser
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Annual Reports
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Notwithstanding clause protects democracy from court-invented rights: Aaron Wudrick in the National Post

Section 33 is not only an appropriate tool for governments, but an essential one to preserve the power of voters.

November 9, 2022
in Aaron Wudrick, Columns, Domestic Policy Program, In the Media, Justice, Latest News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
The Supreme Court’s duty to consult ruling will create immense uncertainty: Dwight Newman in the Globe and Mail

This article originally appeared in the National Post.

By Aaron Wudrick, November 9, 2022

The apocryphal origin story of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms is one familiar to any Canadian with even a passing interest in our history or politics. It goes a little something like this:

In 1982, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau convened a conclave with the provincial premiers and descended from Mount Laurentian to bestow upon us a miraculous gift: the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Nearly two centuries after our neighbours to the south adopted a written bill of rights with constitutional force, Canadians too would finally benefit from a reliable shield against the menacing currents of majoritarian democracy.

Recent events have been unkind to this settled mythology. Last week, the Ontario government invoked a provision of the charter itself to impose a collective agreement on striking education workers, while Quebec recently used the same clause to inoculate discriminatory legislation banning public sector workers from wearing religious symbols.

Given what we’ve all be told about the charter, how is this possible? Aren’t these just the sorts of rights-trampling government actions the charter was intended to prevent?

Inconveniently, the clause in question is no mere afterthought. Section 33 allows governments to declare laws to operate “notwithstanding” certain other sections of the charter. Its inclusion was insisted upon by several premiers from across the political spectrum and was central to assuaging fears of judicial overreach. Without it, it was unlikely any agreement could have even been reached.

The awkward fact of Section 33’s existence has been minimized by its critics ever since. Many claim it was only ever intended to be used sparingly and in extreme circumstances, although these same critics never quite explain just how sparingly and just what said circumstances might look like.

It may finally be time to venture a guess that the purpose of Section 33 is to protect against judicial overreach; that is, the notwithstanding clause is a counterbalance against the court-driven expansion of constitutional rights. Then it follows that governments might start using the clause to put a check on judicial power.

To extend the metaphor of the famous “living tree” doctrine of Canadian constitutional interpretation, which our courts breezily imported into charter interpretation upon its adoption, Section 33 might be considered a pair of shears governments may use to trim any branches they felt were unwieldy.

Concerns about this power are intuitively understandable. After all, what is the point of enlisting courts to protect fundamental rights from the tyranny of the majority, if governments elected by said majority can simply overrule them? As the aforementioned use of the clause by Quebec to ban religious symbols shows, governments may indeed choose to victimize minorities in order to please a larger political constituency.

Yet majoritarian tyranny is not the only threat faced in a democracy. And when elected figures make unpopular choices, the public at least has the opportunity to hold them accountable at the ballot box. What happens when judges exercise power in a way they should not — going beyond the interpretation of existing rights and instead venturing to conjure up new ones?

Expansive interpretation of charter rights by courts — effectively “discovering” or inventing constitutional rights previously unknown — expands judicial power by supplanting parliamentary latitude. Some might argue this is a good thing, but a system of government where the voting public has an ever-shrinking ability to shape the laws of the land seems less, rather than more, democratic.

Viewed this way, Section 33 is not only an appropriate tool for governments, but an essential one to preserve the power of voters.

In fact, contrary to what fans of judicial supremacy may believe, many interpretations of charter rights are reasonably contestable and defensible. Rights interpretation is not like doing math. Nor is it just politicians and judges who might disagree: often judges disagree amongst themselves. This is why appeals courts function as miniature electorates where majority votes still prevail; why higher courts often overturn the decisions of lower courts; and why the Supreme Court of Canada has increasingly overturned its own precedents.

Whatever the merits of its recent invocation, the provinces’ use of Section 33 has at least put to rest some sacred myths about the nature of our charter. While jarring for many, it’s a long overdue opportunity to grasp what it really says, and to have an adult conversation about the trade-offs between giving the final say on contentious rights debates to either courts or elected officials.

Aaron Wudrick is the director of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s domestic policy program. 

Source: National Post
Tags: Aaron Wudricknotwithstanding clause
Previous Post

MLI welcomes the prime minister’s recognition of China’s election interference

Next Post

Unsettling the status quo: Stirrings of reform in the school board trustee battlegrounds

Related Posts

Putin and Xi to meet: Aurel Braun on CTV News
Video

Putin and Xi to meet: Aurel Braun on CTV News

March 21, 2023
Chinese Communist Party
Columns

Measuring the Canadian news media’s great awokening: David Rozado and Aaron Wudrick in the National Post

March 21, 2023
Should Canada get tough with China? Yes: Anastasia Lin in the Toronto Star
Columns

China’s insidious, longstanding effort to meddle in Canadian affairs: Christian Leuprecht in the National Post

March 21, 2023
Next Post
Unsettling the status quo: Stirrings of reform in the school board trustee battlegrounds

Unsettling the status quo: Stirrings of reform in the school board trustee battlegrounds

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Follow us on

Newsletter Signup

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

Inside Policy Magazine

  • Current Issue
  • Back Issues
  • Advertising
  • Inside Policy Blog
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
    • Jobs
    • Women’s History Month Fundraiser
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy Program
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy Program
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy Program
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs Program
  • Projects
    • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
    • Provincial COVID Misery Index
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Dragon at the Door
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
    • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
    • Past Projects
      • Justice Report Card
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Annual Reports
    • Inside Policy Magazine
      • Inside Policy Back Issues
      • Inside Policy Blog
    • Papers
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Straight Talk
    • Video
    • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Leading Economic Indicator
    • Labour Market Report
    • MLI in the Media

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Privacy Preference Center

Consent Management

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other