Friday, September 22, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Divide in the Supreme Court grows in 2016: Benjamin Perrin for iPolitics

December 23, 2016
in Benjamin Perrin, Columns, In the Media, Latest News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A

Ben PerrinBenjamin Perrin argues that the backlash within the court to intrusion on parliamentary responsibilities is growing, with more justices increasingly calling for judicial restraint.

By Benjamin Perrin, Dec. 23, 2016

The Supreme Court of Canada is crossing the line by intruding on Parliament’s policy-making role. This critique is not being leveled by right-wing political scientists, eager politicians or dissatisfied litigants — but rather by judges on the Court itself.

Our annual review of the Court’s top-10 decisions highlights five judges who harshly criticized their colleagues for inappropriately interfering with Parliament’s job. It’s a serious critique that goes to the heart of the relative responsibilities of the Court versus Parliament and points to a growing philosophical rift.

In R. v. Lloyd, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote majority reasons striking down a one-year mandatory minimum penalty for repeat drug trafficking. She suggested Parliament legislate to allow judges to depart from other mandatory sentences to keep them from suffering a similar fate.

The Supreme Court of Canada is crossing the line by intruding on Parliament’s policy-making role.

However, Justices Richard Wagner, Clément Gascon and Russell Brown dissented, stating that if the Chief Justice’s approach is followed “one must question what role is left for Parliament’s legitimate policy choices in setting punishment”. They added that these “are questions of policy that are within the exclusive domain of Parliament”.

Similarly, in R. v. K.R.J., the majority disallowed a new law that permitted judges to prohibit convicted child sex offenders from having contact with persons less than 16 years of age, where the offence took place before the adoption of this law. The majority was not satisfied with the evidence of the benefits of such a retrospective approach. In dissent, Justice Brown argued that the majority “holds Parliament to an exacting standard of proof, thereby denying Parliament the room necessary to perform its legislative policy-development role when addressing a chronic social problem.”

In concurring reasons in R. v. Saeed, Justice Andromache Karakatsanis criticized the majority’s attempt to set out rules for particular types of searches incident to arrest, indicating that such nuanced policies are best left to Parliament. Recently retired Justice Thomas Cromwell made a similar point in concurring reasons in R. v. Jordan regarding timelines for criminal trials.

Tensions between the Court’s judicial oversight role and Parliament’s policy-making role are not new, but the level of internal division within the Court on this issue appears to have deepened.

Over twenty years ago, Justice La Forest wrote in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) that the “courts are not specialists in the realm of policy-making, nor should they be. This is a role properly assigned to the elected representatives of the people, who have at their disposal the necessary institutional resources to enable them to compile and assess social science evidence, to mediate between competing social interests and to reach out and protect vulnerable groups.”

Tensions between the Court’s judicial oversight role and Parliament’s policy-making role are not new

Interestingly, former Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed each of the judges now calling for greater judicial restraint and respect for Parliament. However, these justices do not form a cohesive voting block on the Court. Instead, they have typically raised these concerns in dissenting and concurring reasons.

Another notable trend in our annual reports is the federal government’s significant losing record at the Court. Looking at the outcomes of the top-10 decisions for each of the last three years (30 cases in total), the federal government had just three wins (10.0 per cent), 19 losses (63.3 per cent), four mixed result outcomes (13.3 per cent) and four cases where it did not participate (13.3 per cent).

This dismal record raises questions about the efficacy of the federal government’s approach to litigation and the Court’s view of Parliament’s role. Indeed, there was not a single clear victory for the federal government during the last year on one of these major files, which included appeals argued by both the former Conservative and new Liberal governments. By comparison, various levels of government have historically succeeded in 59 per cent of Charter cases.

The Supreme Court of Canada is a trailblazing institution in Canadian public life that continues to move significant and controversial issues forward. However, the rift between the Court and Parliament continues to deepen. Expectations that this might change with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government have yet to materialize.

Share this:
Tags: Benjamin PerriniPolitics
Previous Post

Christian Leuprecht discusses Berlin terrorist attack with CTV

Next Post

We don’t have to choose between fighting terror and deterring Russia: Marcus Kolga for Inside Policy

Related Posts

Don’t celebrate Iran’s nuclear slowdown just yet: Matthew Bondy in the National Post
Columns

Don’t celebrate Iran’s nuclear slowdown just yet: Matthew Bondy in the National Post

September 22, 2023
Romanian Energy Minister, Sebastian Burduja, talks energy security with Jonathan Berkshire Miller
Video

Romanian Energy Minister, Sebastian Burduja, talks energy security with Jonathan Berkshire Miller

September 21, 2023
Canada-Japan cooperation to counter China’s disinformation campaigns: Charles Burton for Inside Policy
Columns

It’s time for Canada to implement a foreign policy reset: Stephen Nagy in the Japan Times

September 21, 2023
Next Post
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

We don't have to choose between fighting terror and deterring Russia: Marcus Kolga for Inside Policy

Newsletter Signup

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • Economic policy
      • Health Care
      • Innovation
      • Justice
      • Social issues
      • Telecoms
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Foreign Affairs
      • National Defence
      • National Security
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
    • The Transatlantic Program
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Competition Policy in Canada
    • Speak for Ourselves
    • Justice Report Card
    • COVID Misery Index
      • Provincial COVID Misery Index
      • Beyond Lockdown
      • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
    • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
      • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
    • Past Projects
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Libraries
    • Inside Policy
    • Papers
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Books
    • Video

© 2021 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

IDEAS CHANGE THE WORLD!Have the latest Canadian thought leadership delivered straight to your inbox.
First Name
Last Name
Email address

No thanks, I’m not interested.