Friday, June 6, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Notwithstanding clause protects democracy from court-invented rights: Aaron Wudrick in the National Post

Section 33 is not only an appropriate tool for governments, but an essential one to preserve the power of voters.

November 9, 2022
in Aaron Wudrick, Domestic Policy, Latest News, Columns, In the Media, Justice
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
The Supreme Court’s duty to consult ruling will create immense uncertainty: Dwight Newman in the Globe and Mail

This article originally appeared in the National Post.

By Aaron Wudrick, November 9, 2022

The apocryphal origin story of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms is one familiar to any Canadian with even a passing interest in our history or politics. It goes a little something like this:

In 1982, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau convened a conclave with the provincial premiers and descended from Mount Laurentian to bestow upon us a miraculous gift: the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Nearly two centuries after our neighbours to the south adopted a written bill of rights with constitutional force, Canadians too would finally benefit from a reliable shield against the menacing currents of majoritarian democracy.

Recent events have been unkind to this settled mythology. Last week, the Ontario government invoked a provision of the charter itself to impose a collective agreement on striking education workers, while Quebec recently used the same clause to inoculate discriminatory legislation banning public sector workers from wearing religious symbols.

Given what we’ve all be told about the charter, how is this possible? Aren’t these just the sorts of rights-trampling government actions the charter was intended to prevent?

Inconveniently, the clause in question is no mere afterthought. Section 33 allows governments to declare laws to operate “notwithstanding” certain other sections of the charter. Its inclusion was insisted upon by several premiers from across the political spectrum and was central to assuaging fears of judicial overreach. Without it, it was unlikely any agreement could have even been reached.

The awkward fact of Section 33’s existence has been minimized by its critics ever since. Many claim it was only ever intended to be used sparingly and in extreme circumstances, although these same critics never quite explain just how sparingly and just what said circumstances might look like.

It may finally be time to venture a guess that the purpose of Section 33 is to protect against judicial overreach; that is, the notwithstanding clause is a counterbalance against the court-driven expansion of constitutional rights. Then it follows that governments might start using the clause to put a check on judicial power.

To extend the metaphor of the famous “living tree” doctrine of Canadian constitutional interpretation, which our courts breezily imported into charter interpretation upon its adoption, Section 33 might be considered a pair of shears governments may use to trim any branches they felt were unwieldy.

Concerns about this power are intuitively understandable. After all, what is the point of enlisting courts to protect fundamental rights from the tyranny of the majority, if governments elected by said majority can simply overrule them? As the aforementioned use of the clause by Quebec to ban religious symbols shows, governments may indeed choose to victimize minorities in order to please a larger political constituency.

Yet majoritarian tyranny is not the only threat faced in a democracy. And when elected figures make unpopular choices, the public at least has the opportunity to hold them accountable at the ballot box. What happens when judges exercise power in a way they should not — going beyond the interpretation of existing rights and instead venturing to conjure up new ones?

Expansive interpretation of charter rights by courts — effectively “discovering” or inventing constitutional rights previously unknown — expands judicial power by supplanting parliamentary latitude. Some might argue this is a good thing, but a system of government where the voting public has an ever-shrinking ability to shape the laws of the land seems less, rather than more, democratic.

Viewed this way, Section 33 is not only an appropriate tool for governments, but an essential one to preserve the power of voters.

In fact, contrary to what fans of judicial supremacy may believe, many interpretations of charter rights are reasonably contestable and defensible. Rights interpretation is not like doing math. Nor is it just politicians and judges who might disagree: often judges disagree amongst themselves. This is why appeals courts function as miniature electorates where majority votes still prevail; why higher courts often overturn the decisions of lower courts; and why the Supreme Court of Canada has increasingly overturned its own precedents.

Whatever the merits of its recent invocation, the provinces’ use of Section 33 has at least put to rest some sacred myths about the nature of our charter. While jarring for many, it’s a long overdue opportunity to grasp what it really says, and to have an adult conversation about the trade-offs between giving the final say on contentious rights debates to either courts or elected officials.

Aaron Wudrick is the director of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s domestic policy program. 

Source: National Post
Tags: notwithstanding clauseAaron Wudrick
Previous Post

MLI welcomes the prime minister’s recognition of China’s election interference

Next Post

Unsettling the status quo: Stirrings of reform in the school board trustee battlegrounds

Related Posts

Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care: Mia Hughes in the National Post
Gender Identity

Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care: Mia Hughes in the National Post

June 6, 2025
Trump’s populism has infantilized the presidency: Aurel Braun in the National Interest
Foreign Affairs

Trump’s populism has infantilized the presidency: Aurel Braun in the National Interest

June 6, 2025
Free markets and liberty are not ends unto themselves: Oren Cass and Peter Copeland for Inside Policy Talks
Domestic Policy

Free markets and liberty are not ends unto themselves: Oren Cass and Peter Copeland for Inside Policy Talks

June 5, 2025
Next Post
Unsettling the status quo: Stirrings of reform in the school board trustee battlegrounds

Unsettling the status quo: Stirrings of reform in the school board trustee battlegrounds

Newsletter Signup

  Thank you for Signing Up
  Please correct the marked field(s) below.
Email Address  *
1,true,6,Contact Email,2
First Name *
1,true,1,First Name,2
Last Name *
1,true,1,Last Name,2
*
*Required Fields

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Privacy Preference Center

Consent Management

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

Lightbox image placeholder

Previous Slide

Next Slide

Share

Facebook ShareTwitter ShareLinkedin SharePinterest ShareEmail Share

TwitterTwitter
Hide Tweet (admin)

Add this ID to the plugin's Hide Specific Tweets setting: