Thursday, May 29, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Forget the photo ops. Here’s what you should base your vote on: Jerome Gessaroli in Canadian Affairs

The Liberals and Conservatives’ different underlying values dictate what each party would offer voters. Here’s what you should know about those values

April 7, 2025
in Domestic Policy, Energy Policy, Latest News, Columns, Foreign Policy, Indigenous Affairs, In the Media, Intergovernmental Affairs, Economic Policy, North America, Jerome Gessaroli
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Forget the photo ops. Here’s what you should base your vote on: Jerome Gessaroli in Canadian Affairs

Image via Canva.

This article originally appeared in Canadian Affairs.

By Jerome Gessaroli, April 7, 2025

The stakes are high as Canadians prepare to vote. The country faces aggressive U.S. tariffs, an affordability and housing crisis, and declining living standards relative to other OECD countries.

Amid the noise of campaign promises and personality politics, voters must choose between two different visions for Canada’s future — one defined by government-led solutions and the other by market-based approaches.

Rather than getting caught up in each leader’s personality, it may be more useful to consider the underlying values driving each party. After all, leaders are chosen by their party’s members and supported by the caucus. While they may have their own priorities, leaders will mostly be in sync with their party. For voters, understanding these core values may offer a better guide than relying solely on each candidate’s rhetoric.

Liberals generally see government as a way to influence social and economic outcomes. They support intervention through taxation, regulations and spending to address their priorities, such as climate change and child care. Socially, they emphasize inclusion, diversity and rights protections, viewing government as a vehicle for advancing pluralism and collective progress.

Conservatives, in contrast, place more emphasis on individuals and markets. They tend to support a more limited government that is focused on ensuring core services, order and an environment that allows private enterprises to thrive. Their approach favours lower taxes, lighter regulation and fiscal restraint. They are typically skeptical of state-led solutions and more focused on maintaining established norms.

Both parties recognize Canada’s extremely poor productivity growth record, and its importance for maintaining living standards. But their responses differ.

Liberals look to government-led strategies — including public investments in child care, education and technology — as foundations for growth. They support industrial policy and subsidies for government chosen sectors, such as clean innovation. Critics argue this has done little to raise per capita output.

Conservatives favour market-led productivity growth. They believe tax relief, deregulation and resource development attract private investment. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre pledges to reduce hurdles to construction, energy projects and entrepreneurship. The goal is to stimulate productivity by freeing capital and initiative. Critics counter that without public funding in emerging sectors the strategy may have limited success.

The parties also differ on fiscal policy.

The Trudeau Liberals ran deficits even during periods of economic growth. From 2016 to 2023, federal program spending rose about 10 per cent annually, up from just over two per cent from 2006 to 2015. Liberals say the increased spending boosts growth and funds important programs, while Conservatives say it adds to the national debt and raises interest expenses.

Conservatives instead focus on managing spending in order to balance budgets. In response to the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the Harper government recorded a $55 billion budget deficit. But it returned to a small surplus by 2015 through spending cuts.

A future Liberal government under Mark Carney would likely continue to run (smaller) deficits to keep debt manageable relative to GDP. New revenues may come from higher taxes on corporations. Conservatives would likely scale back the budget, cut some Liberal programs and reduce the size of the public service.

Climate policy offers perhaps the starkest contrast.

Liberals would keep regulations and subsidies to cut emissions, while Conservatives propose eliminating all carbon taxes and relaxing regulations they see as harmful to competitiveness. Their approach relies on private sector-led emissions reductions, carbon capture and other mitigation technologies. While this may lower costs for households and businesses, it could make emissions targets harder to meet.

On Indigenous matters, Liberals stress reconciliation, rights recognition and increased funding. They passed legislation recognizing UNDRIP, a United Nations declaration supporting Indigenous rights, framing the relationship as nation-to-nation. Conservatives focus more on economic opportunity, such as resource partnerships, and administrative transparency.

In health care, Liberals have increased transfers, introduced new federal programs such as dental benefits, and oppose any private involvement in the public system. Conservatives also support increased funding, but with fewer federal restrictions and are open to limited private delivery within the public health-care system.

Regarding civil liberties, Liberals prioritize protecting vulnerable groups, regulating harmful content and promoting equality, even if it means limiting some expression. Conservatives favour free speech, religious freedom and opposition to state authority. They oppose legislation such as Bill C-11, which regulates online content, and proposed online harms laws.

Headlines and photo-ops are often a distraction from what is really at stake in an election. It is by understanding parties’ values and priorities that voters can best understand how each party would govern.

Although both Liberals and Conservatives aim to improve life in Canada, they take different paths: Liberals rely on government action, while Conservatives favour private enterprise and individual initiative.


Jerome Gessaroli is a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and leads the Sound Economic Policy Project at the British Columbia Institute of Technology.


The author of this piece has worked independently and is solely responsible for the views presented here. The opinions are not necessarily those of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, its directors or supporters. The Macdonald-Laurier Institute is non-partisan and neither endorses nor supports candidates or political parties. We encourage our senior fellows to comment on public policy issues, including during election campaigns, but the publication of such expert commentary should not be confused with the institute taking a position for or against any party or candidate.

Source: Canadian Affairs

Related Posts

Moving the needle: How “safe supply” became Canada’s answer to the opioid crisis, why it failed, and how we can do better
Health

Moving the needle: How “safe supply” became Canada’s answer to the opioid crisis, why it failed, and how we can do better

May 29, 2025
Why Britain must look towards the ‘Great Dominion’: Matthew Bondy in CapX
Foreign Affairs

Why Britain must look towards the ‘Great Dominion’: Matthew Bondy in CapX

May 28, 2025
(Im)balance of power – How federal overreach fuels Western Alienation: Sonya Savage and Heather Exner-Pirot
Intergovernmental Affairs

(Im)balance of power – How federal overreach fuels Western Alienation: Sonya Savage and Heather Exner-Pirot

May 28, 2025
Next Post
First Nations are ready to stand with Canada against Trump’s tariff threat: Stephen Buffalo in the Calgary Herald

First Nations are ready to stand with Canada against Trump’s tariff threat: Stephen Buffalo in the Calgary Herald

Newsletter Signup

  Thank you for Signing Up
  Please correct the marked field(s) below.
Email Address  *
1,true,6,Contact Email,2
First Name *
1,true,1,First Name,2
Last Name *
1,true,1,Last Name,2
*
*Required Fields

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

Lightbox image placeholder

Previous Slide

Next Slide

Share

Facebook ShareTwitter ShareLinkedin SharePinterest ShareEmail Share

TwitterTwitter
Hide Tweet (admin)

Add this ID to the plugin's Hide Specific Tweets setting: