Wednesday, June 25, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Don’t let Competition Act changes suffocate innovation, productivity: Jerome Gessaroli in the Financial Post

Consequences can be worse than any benefits.

February 16, 2023
in Domestic Policy, Competition policy, Latest News, Columns, In the Media, Economic Policy, Jerome Gessaroli
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
A digital-tax war is coming to a galaxy not so far, far away: Arthur Cockfield in the Globe and Mail

This article originally appeared in the Financial Post.

By Jerome Gessaroli, February 16, 2023

There is growing concern that “big tech” companies like Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft have become so large they pose a threat to competition in the digital economy. Those calling for change argue that Canada’s Competition Act must be strengthened to enable the government to regulate these firms’ market dominance.

But competition policy tools can be very blunt, and their use can have consequences worse than any benefits they might produce. Moreover, government already has significant powers to police competition. We therefore need to be careful with any reforms we make.

Often a market economy is evaluated against an impossibly high standard — the “perfect competition” described in introductory economics. Because the real economy inevitably falls short of this theoretical ideal, people call on government to step in and repair the deficiencies. But, as in many areas of life, we shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

If industry concentration is too high, activists say, government should break up the dominant business, limit its acquisitions or force it to provide data to competitors in order to level the playing field. That all sounds very reasonable, maybe even perfectly reasonable, but its unintended consequences could involve destroying the innovation and productivity that are key to Canadians’ standard of living.

The most troubling aspect of proposed changes to the Competition Act is their possible negative impact on productivity. The OECD already forecasts Canada will have the lowest productivity growth among its 38 member nations all the way out to 2060. Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland acknowledged as much in her 2022 budget speech when she referred to productivity and innovation as “the Achilles heel of the Canadian economy.”

We cannot afford even more regulation of the economy. Our ability to generate goods and services more productively relies on innovation — finding technologies, applications and business processes that produce more with less. Digital innovations such as 5G, Web 3.0, artificial intelligence and others will help drive us forward — unless regulation holds them back.

Another way to handle market dominance is to let the market self-correct. If a company has market power and can charge monopoly-like prices, it will generate monopoly-like profits. But over-sized profits create an over-sized incentive for others to innovate so they can capture some of those profits. It’s just such innovation and competition that will bring down prices and make consumers better off.

A critique sometimes levelled at the self-regulating market solution is that the dominant digital platform tends toward a natural monopoly. As more users join a platform, it becomes more valuable for everyone, thus encouraging even more users to join. This leads to a winner-take-all type of market and makes it hard to dislodge the dominant platform.

That argument is certainly not new. A 2007 article in The Guardian discussed the difficulty of competing against a large, well-entrenched social media platform. “Users have invested so much social capital in putting up data about themselves it is not worth their changing sites, especially since every new user that … (it) attracts adds to its value as a network of interacting people.” All true — except that the article was about MySpace, the once-dominant social media site. Size and barriers to entry certainly did not protect MySpace from being replaced by Facebook and other social media sites.

Others accuse big tech companies of limiting competition by buying out smaller, innovative players before they can operate at scale. But in many instances small companies are acquired primarily for their technical staff, rather than the product itself. This “acqui-hire” phenomenon is an effective method for hiring within Silicon Valley as it limits salary friction between new and existing staff and provides an exit strategy to venture-capital investors.

In a 2020 survey, 58 per cent of U.S. and 60 per cent of Canadian start-ups saw being bought out as a long-term goal. Regulations limiting acquisitions could eliminate a lucrative exit strategy for many start-up founders and their investors, with the unintended consequence of reducing the incentive for investors to provide the venture capital that is usually vital for a start-up’s success.

The federal government already has ample power to police competition. As currently written, the Competition Act is focused — correctly — on economic matters, such as price, quality, and innovation. It can already handle abusive practices by the operators of digital platforms. Although the act probably could use updating to increase possible fines and to broaden private civil actions covering allegations of anti-competitive behaviour, reforms to lower the standard for finding anti-competitive behaviour, enable “regulatory guardrails” or even address social issues could well end up reducing innovation, productivity growth and future living standards. That’s a mistake we do not want to make.

Jerome Gessaroli, a visiting fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, leads “The Sound Economic Policy Project” at the British Columbia Institute of Technology.

Source: Financial Post
Tags: Competition ActFinancial PostJerome Gessaroli
Previous Post

Montreal’s Sir John A. Macdonald statue should be put back: Patrice Dutil in the Montreal Gazette

Next Post

The Macdonald-Laurier Institute Welcomes New Visiting Fellows, Kyoko Kuwahara and Sohyung Hyun

Related Posts

If RCMP is probing Israel for war crimes, it has no morality: Dagny Pawlak and Joe Adam George in the National Post
Domestic Policy

If RCMP is probing Israel for war crimes, it has no morality: Dagny Pawlak and Joe Adam George in the National Post

June 25, 2025
How much did Canada’s trade retaliation and boycotts actually hurt the U.S.? Trevor Tombe in The Hub
Economic Policy

How much did Canada’s trade retaliation and boycotts actually hurt the U.S.? Trevor Tombe in The Hub

June 25, 2025
Three requests Netanyahu should keep in mind when handling Iran: Kaveh Shahrooz in the Jerusalem Post
Foreign Affairs

Three requests Netanyahu should keep in mind when handling Iran: Kaveh Shahrooz in the Jerusalem Post

June 25, 2025
Next Post
MLI experts available to comment on Cabinet shuffle

The Macdonald-Laurier Institute Welcomes New Visiting Fellows, Kyoko Kuwahara and Sohyung Hyun

Newsletter Signup

  Thank you for Signing Up
  Please correct the marked field(s) below.
Email Address  *
1,true,6,Contact Email,2
First Name *
1,true,1,First Name,2
Last Name *
1,true,1,Last Name,2
*
*Required Fields

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Privacy Preference Center

Consent Management

Necessary

Advertising

Analytics

Other

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

Lightbox image placeholder

Previous Slide

Next Slide

Share

Facebook ShareTwitter ShareLinkedin SharePinterest ShareEmail Share

TwitterTwitter
Hide Tweet (admin)

Add this ID to the plugin's Hide Specific Tweets setting: