Friday, June 6, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

Hiding behind national security will erode trust in Emergencies Act inquiries: Ryan Alford in the National Post

When it comes to the judgment of whether the Trudeau government abused its emergency powers, justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done.

September 7, 2022
in Domestic Policy, Latest News, Columns, In the Media, Justice, Social Issues, Ryan Alford
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Hiding behind national security will erode trust in Emergencies Act inquiries: Ryan Alford in the National Post

Photo by Michael_Swan, via Flickr.

This article originally appeared in the National Post.

By Ryan Alford, September 7, 2022

Half a year has gone by since the Trudeau government took the unprecedented step of invoking the Emergencies Act to deal with protesters in Ottawa and at several border crossings. Yet the question of whether this was an appropriate and measured use of emergency powers or an unconstitutional power grab seems no closer to being answered — and likely won’t be, so long as Ottawa continues to hide behind a veil of secrecy.

At both the special joint committee on the declaration of the emergency and in Federal Court, the government has repeatedly invoked cabinet confidentiality to withhold the information that the Incident Response Group (IRG) allegedly relied on to conclude that the Freedom Convoy was a threat to the security of Canada linked to ideologically motivated violent extremism, which is the essential precondition for the lawful use of emergency powers.

If the IRG had no reasonable basis for concluding that a threat of this nature existed, the government expanded its own powers contrary to both law and the Constitution. This would be the most serious assault on the rule of law imaginable. Yet it increasingly appears as though the government’s conclusion had been tenuous at best.

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino has stated repeatedly that the police requested the invocation of the Emergencies Act, only to be contradicted with sworn testimony from every police service on the scene.

Later, it was revealed that the federal government declared an emergency, despite being told of a possible breakthrough in talks between the City of Ottawa and the convoy organizers the day before. That deal would have seen many, if not all, of the trucks leaving residential areas. Since the Windsor, Ont., and Coutts, Alta., blockades had already been lifted, this might have catalyzed a peaceful end to the protests.

Despite these revelations, what we might never know looms large over what has come to light, as numerous documents pertaining to the government’s decision that were ordered released by the Federal Court have been so heavily redacted, they now resemble black rectangles with page numbers.

To counter the negative impression this lack of transparency created, the government declared with great fanfare that it would waive cabinet confidentiality before the Public Order Emergency Commission, which intends “to examine and assess the basis for the government’s decision to declare a public order emergency.” Unfortunately, this may prove to be yet another empty promise.

While the commission appears to have shamed the government into waiving one form of confidentiality, Ottawa has another, more powerful privilege that it can rely upon to redact documents and shield its witnesses: national security confidentiality (NSC).

The government fought hard to ensure NSC provisions were included in the commission’s “rules of practice and procedure,” which suggests that it is intent on using them. This, despite the fact that there have been numerous judicial findings of the overuse and misuse of national security confidentiality, particularly when it has been used to disguise the weaknesses of the government’s conclusions about security risks.

As then-Supreme Court chief justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in Canada v. Harkat, judges “must be vigilant and skeptical with respect to the minister’s claims of confidentiality. Courts have commented on the government’s tendency to exaggerate claims of national security confidentiality.”

As Associate Chief Justice of Ontario Dennis O’Connor noted when sitting as the commissioner of the Arar inquiry, the overuse of national security confidentiality “promotes public suspicion and cynicism.… It is very important that, at the outset of proceedings of this kind, every possible effort be made to avoid overclaiming.”

The Public Order Emergency Commission is well aware of this problem: in its rules, it states that it “expects the government to take a considered, proportionate and reasonable approach in making assertions of NSC.”

National security confidentiality is dangerous to an inquiry because it can be wielded not only as a shield, but as a sword. It allows for extensive redactions of intelligence reports the government chooses to submit to bolster its case, but the government can also deploy it to place dubious material before commissioner Paul Rouleau, in a manner that bypasses the challenges that are necessary to determine its reliability. Witnesses may testify outside of the presence of the public and the parties, and documents may be admitted but never seen by anyone other than the commissioner and his staff.

The inquiry’s ultimate conclusion about whether the government engaged in a grossly unconstitutional abuse of power will likely turn on its findings about the links between the Freedom Convoy and ideologically motivated violent extremists. The protesters have pointed to the efforts they took to exclude anyone advocating violence and will likely testify to that effect and be cross-examined vigorously.

In the absence of any contradictory evidence that they were influenced by extremists, the government will likely shift to a different claim: that the protests have emboldened extremists. Indeed, redacted “threat highlights” from the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre have already described the convoy protesters as a dangerous catalyst for anger on the far right.

It remains to be seen whether the commission would accept an argument that the emboldening of otherwise unaffiliated extremists could suffice as a rationale for the government to reasonably conclude that a threat to the security of Canada existed.

That would be problematic, as the Emergencies Act states that a public order emergency of this nature must arise from the threat of violent extremism, not that it might merely create an opportunity for other bad actors. Approving the use of emergency powers to limit Canadians’ charter rights of freedom of speech and assembly because of their possible unintended consequences would have dystopian implications.

These serious constitutional infirmities may not be obvious if the government’s assertions are packaged withing alarming hypothetical scenarios and presented behind closed doors, untested through the cross-examination of expert witnesses. To make matters worse, the agencies tasked with formulating and delivering these confidential assessments have a history of being unfaithful to the law, and to the truth.

Less than two years ago, revelations of the security establishment’s disturbing approach to investigating and reporting on extremism led to harsh condemnation by the Federal Court, which criticized it for demonstrating “a degree of institutional disregard for — or, at the very least, a cavalier institutional approach to — the duty of candour and regrettably the rule of law.”

An official conclusion that the government had a reasonable basis to conclude that the Freedom Convoy represented a threat to the security of Canada predicated on secret intelligence detailing vague links between those engaged in peaceful protests and extremists would only deepen the public cynicism that Justice O’Connor warned about, especially since we have had so many other warnings from eminent jurists of the government’s propensity to exaggerate such claims.

When it comes to the judgment of whether the Trudeau government abused its emergency powers, justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done. Findings in favour of the government on the basis of secret evidence that might never be seen will never be trusted. The preservation of the rule of law requires, to use the Public Order Emergency Commission’s words, a “transparent and thorough review of the circumstances that led to the declaration of a public order emergency.”

Ryan Alford is a professor in the Bora Laskin Faculty of Law at Lakehead University and a Senior Fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. He was granted joint standing with the Canadian Constitution Foundation as a party before the Public Order Emergency Commission.

Source: National Post
Tags: constitutionEmergencies Act
Previous Post

Canada’s support for Taiwan is much too weak: Jeff Kucharski in the National Post

Next Post

In this devastating moment, Canada must support the James Smith Cree Nation: Ken Coates in the Globe and Mail

Related Posts

Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care: Mia Hughes in the National Post
Gender Identity

Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care: Mia Hughes in the National Post

June 6, 2025
Trump’s populism has infantilized the presidency: Aurel Braun in the National Interest
Foreign Affairs

Trump’s populism has infantilized the presidency: Aurel Braun in the National Interest

June 6, 2025
Free markets and liberty are not ends unto themselves: Oren Cass and Peter Copeland for Inside Policy Talks
Domestic Policy

Free markets and liberty are not ends unto themselves: Oren Cass and Peter Copeland for Inside Policy Talks

June 5, 2025
Next Post
In this devastating moment, Canada must support the James Smith Cree Nation: Ken Coates in the Globe and Mail

In this devastating moment, Canada must support the James Smith Cree Nation: Ken Coates in the Globe and Mail

Newsletter Signup

  Thank you for Signing Up
  Please correct the marked field(s) below.
Email Address  *
1,true,6,Contact Email,2
First Name *
1,true,1,First Name,2
Last Name *
1,true,1,Last Name,2
*
*Required Fields

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

Lightbox image placeholder

Previous Slide

Next Slide

Share

Facebook ShareTwitter ShareLinkedin SharePinterest ShareEmail Share

TwitterTwitter
Hide Tweet (admin)

Add this ID to the plugin's Hide Specific Tweets setting: