Tuesday, May 27, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Media
Support Us
Macdonald-Laurier Institute
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
        • Provincial COVID Misery Index
        • Beyond Lockdown
        • COVID and after: A mandate for recovery
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
        • Aboriginal Canada and Natural Resources
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video
No Result
View All Result
Macdonald-Laurier Institute

We have a tariff reprieve. Let’s use it to firmly establish the facts: Tim Sargent and Fen Osler Hampson for Policy Magazine

The American public must understand that tariffs are a flawed policy not in their self-interest - retaliation would simply make it much easier for Trump to appeal to American patriotism and portray this as an economic war instead of an act of economic self-harm.

February 4, 2025
in Domestic Policy, Latest News, Columns, In the Media, Economic Policy, North America, Tim Sargent
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
We have a tariff reprieve. Let’s use it to firmly establish the facts: Tim Sargent and Fen Osler Hampson for Policy Magazine

Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead.

This article was published by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s Washington office, the Center for North American Prosperity and Security (CNAPS.org). It originally appeared in Policy.

By Tim Sargent and Fen Osler Hampson, February 4, 2025

While Donald Trump has now agreed to a 30-day pause on his threatened 25% tariffs against Canada, that threat remains active, now linked to a vague “economic deal” per his social media post on the subject.

The iron laws of economics and US politics will eventually defeat Trump’s use of tariffs against Canada, Mexico, and China. But it will take time, and Canada has much to do to get its house in order to avoid being such a tempting target for our neighborhood bully. As Sun Tzu said in The Art of War, “To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands.”

Trump claims that tariffs would allow him to achieve three ambitious policy objectives simultaneously: 1.) eliminate illegal immigration and the cross-border fentanyl trade; 2.) solve America’s fiscal problems by raising enough revenue to cut their astronomical deficit while extending and deepening the Trump 1.0 tax cuts; and 3.) rebuild US manufacturing strength by reshoring industries such as autos and steel.

But, as so many experts in all of the above fields and no less a credible source than The Wall Street Journal have pointed out, much of this is pie in the sky, and Trump’s chances of achieving any such goals via a trade war against his two North American neighbours and China are slim.

Illegal migrants will cross the border if businesses are willing to employ them. Drugs, including fentanyl, will flow as long as there are consumers to buy them. If Trump succeeds in levying tariffs, Mexico, which is the primary source of illegal migrants and drugs, would have no incentive to curb these flows: quite the opposite.

Would tariffs alleviate US budget and fiscal pressures?

The short answer is, not much. The US budget deficit in 2023 was 6% of GDP. Total imports were only 14.1% of GDP, and imports from China, Mexico, and Canada were less than 40%, for a total of 5.3% of GDP. According to our calculations, Trump’s tariffs would only raise around 1% of GDP, which is not enough to make a significant dent in the deficit or pay for extending the tax cuts, around 1.5% of GDP. And this all assumes people wouldn’t substitute away from imports, which they almost certainly would. The bottom line is that the US doesn’t import enough to make tariffs a significant source of revenue.

Why is the US manufacturing sector in decline?

The real reason is automation and the unwillingness of Americans to do repetitive manufacturing jobs. This has much more to do with the decline of employment in the US manufacturing sector than competition from cheaper-wage countries like Mexico, Canada, or China. The impact of tariffs in the case of China, for example, will be offset by Beijing’s managed exchange rates as they drop the price of the renminbi. The wage differential with Mexico is too large for even a 25% tariff to make much difference. Canada’s trade with the US in autos, for instance, is mainly balanced.

Would Trump’s tariffs hurt Americans?

The short answer is yes, in more ways than one. Tariffs are a circular firing squad and would inflict pain on American producers and consumers who import goods, commodities, and natural resources from Canada, Mexico, and China. Not only would prices rise sharply, often in unpredictable ways, given the deep integration among the three economies, but we could also see supply disruptions reminiscent of COVID as some suppliers become uneconomical and disputes over who initially pays the tariffs mount.

Even without retaliation, US exporters, including in the agricultural sector, would be hit as the US dollar rises, key customers in Mexico and Canada would become less able to afford US exports, and the price of inputs such as fertilizer would increase.

Americans would also see a hit to their pensions from the tariff war

The stock market was already reacting unfavourably to what would be a significant blow to the profitability of large US companies. This would go directly to the value of Americans’ retirement savings, i.e., their 401(k) defined contribution plans.

Just as Trump cannot repeal the laws of economics, he cannot repeal the laws of US politics

Trump is now a one-term president: he cannot run again without a change in the constitution; furthermore, he is not a young man. He has a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives, and the 2026 midterms are less than two years away.

This means that time is not on Trump’s side: as the pain of his tariffs would mount, so would the noise and pushback from different corners of the US political system. Americans are not noted for their stoicism regarding their immediate economic interests, especially when the government takes money out of their pocketbooks, as tariffs would.

But difficult days lie ahead for Canada

None of the above means there aren’t difficult days ahead for Canada. Make no mistake, we are being singled out because we are perceived as small, weak, and free riders on America’s security coattails.

We are small—less than one 10th the size of the US economy—and we are weak: many years of political complacency have weakened our economy, our defences, and even our sense of nationhood.

To get through this, we must become strong and smart.

Dollar-for-dollar, counter-tariffs to Trump’s would not be a viable response

Retaliating in kind to Trump would mean playing the game according to his rules, which is just what he wants.

Because we are so much more dependent on trade with the US than they are with us—exports to the US account for about a quarter of our economy versus 1.6% for the US—we would never win a tit-for-tat trade war for the simple reasons the Americans have clear escalation dominance. This is unlike the steel and aluminum spat of 2018, when the battle was just about one sector.

Furthermore, we would risk blurring the signal. The American public must understand that tariffs are a flawed policy not in their self-interest. Retaliation by us would simply make it much easier for Trump to appeal to American patriotism and portray this as an economic war instead of an act of economic self-harm.

Most importantly, would tariffs hurt us as much as the US by raising prices and distorting decisions. We should simply not accept Trump’s deeply flawed economic meme that tariffs are a cost-free policy tool.

That does not mean that there aren’t tactics other than tariffs that we could use. For example, one of the things the US has pushed hard for in trade deals is protections for IP in areas such as pharmaceuticals and copyright, where large US companies rake in billions from Canadian consumers. If the US no longer wants to live up to these trade deals, we must ask ourselves whether these protections must be as strong.

But the most important thing we must do is make Canada strong again. We must put aside policy distractions and focus on building our core strengths. Specifically:

  • We must free-up our over-regulated resource sector and invoke national security to build pipelines East and West rapidly
  • We must refashion our bloated and inefficient governments and radically reform our tax systems to encourage investment, innovation, and work effort
  • We must reinvest in our military to be taken seriously again as an ally. We should prioritize the Arctic’s defense so that no one, including the US, doubts that we can defend our sovereignty.

Above all, we need to rediscover our sense of nationhood. Trump’s gibes about making Canada the 51ststate touch a nerve precisely because our sense of national unity and collective purpose has not been tested since the 1995 Quebec referendum, three decades ago. Trump thinks we are ripe for the plucking. We can and will prove him wrong.


Tim Sargent is Director of Domestic Policy and Senior Fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa. He was Deputy Minister of Trade during the renegotiation of NAFTA during the first Trump administration.

Fen Osler Hampson, FRSC, is the Chancellor’s Professor and Professor of International Affairs at Carleton University, and President of the World Refugee & Migration Council. He is the former Director of Carleton’s School of International Affairs and author and co-editor of some 48 books on international affairs.

Source: Policy Magazine
Tags: Fen Osler Hampson

Related Posts

The Europe–Canada Schicksalsgemeinschaft: Christian Leuprecht in European View
Europe and Russia

The Europe–Canada Schicksalsgemeinschaft: Christian Leuprecht in European View

May 27, 2025
New Parliament gathering this week was produced by a ‘losers’ election’: Ken Coates in National Newswatch
Domestic Policy

New Parliament gathering this week was produced by a ‘losers’ election’: Ken Coates in National Newswatch

May 26, 2025
Japan must reboot its disinformation defences: Kyoko Kuwahara in East Asia Forum
Foreign Affairs

Japan must reboot its disinformation defences: Kyoko Kuwahara in East Asia Forum

May 26, 2025
Next Post
Trump sets the stage for the next Canadian election: Jack Mintz in the National Post

Trump sets the stage for the next Canadian election: Jack Mintz in the National Post

Newsletter Signup

  Thank you for Signing Up
  Please correct the marked field(s) below.
Email Address  *
1,true,6,Contact Email,2
First Name *
1,true,1,First Name,2
Last Name *
1,true,1,Last Name,2
*
*Required Fields

Follow us on

Macdonald-Laurier Institute

323 Chapel Street, Suite #300
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 7Z2 Canada

613.482.8327

info@macdonaldlaurier.ca
MLI directory

Support Us

Support the Macdonald-Laurier Institute to help ensure that Canada is one of the best governed countries in the world. Click below to learn more or become a sponsor.

Support Us

  • Inside Policy Magazine
  • Annual Reports
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Policy

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Who Makes MLI Work
    • Tenth Anniversary
  • Experts
    • Experts Directory
    • In Memoriam
  • Issues
    • Domestic Policy
      • Economic Policy
      • Justice
      • Rights and Freedoms
      • Assisted Suicide (MAID)
      • Health Care
      • COVID-19
      • Gender Identity
      • Canada’s Political Tradition
      • AI, Technology and Innovation
      • Media and Telecoms
      • Housing
      • Immigration
      • Agriculture and Agri-Food
      • Competition Policy
    • Energy Policy
      • Energy
      • Environment
    • Foreign Policy
      • Israel-Hamas War
      • Ukraine
      • Taiwan
      • China
      • Europe and Russia
      • Indo-Pacific
      • Middle East and North Africa
      • North America
      • Foreign Interference
      • National Defence
      • National Security
      • Foreign Affairs
    • Indigenous Affairs
  • Projects
    • CNAPS (Center for North American Prosperity and Security)
    • The Promised Land
    • Voices that Inspire: The Macdonald-Laurier Vancouver Speaker Series
    • Dragon at the Door
    • Canada on top of the world
    • Justice Report Card
    • The Great Energy Crisis
    • DisInfoWatch.org
    • Double Trouble
    • Digital Policy & Connectivity
    • Managing Indigenous Prosperity
    • Defending The Marketplace of Ideas
    • Reforming the University
    • Past Projects
      • Canada and the Indo-Pacific Initiative
      • The Transatlantic Program
      • COVID Misery Index
      • Speak for Ourselves
      • The Eavesdropping Dragon: Huawei
      • Talkin’ in the Free World with Mariam Memarsadeghi
      • An Intellectual Property Strategy for Canada
      • Munk Senior Fellows
      • A Mandate for Canada
      • Confederation Series
      • Fiscal Reform
      • The Canadian Century project
      • Fixing Canadian health care
      • Internal trade
      • From a mandate for change
      • Size of government in Canada
      • Straight Talk
      • Labour Market Report
      • Leading Economic Indicator
      • Centre for Advancing Canada’s Interests Abroad
      • Indigenous Prosperity at a Crossroads
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events
      • MLI Dinners
      • Great Canadian Debates
  • Latest News
  • Inside Policy
  • Libraries
    • Columns
    • Commentary
    • Papers
    • Books
    • Video

© 2023 Macdonald-Laurier Institute. All Rights reserved.

Lightbox image placeholder

Previous Slide

Next Slide

Share

Facebook ShareTwitter ShareLinkedin SharePinterest ShareEmail Share

TwitterTwitter
Hide Tweet (admin)

Add this ID to the plugin's Hide Specific Tweets setting: